The fall of BarFutures

From The Law Society Gazette 08/06/10:

Experimental virtual chambers BarFutures is to close its doors at the end of June after two years because of a ‘lack of appetite for change within the profession’, the Gazette has learned.

The alternative set was designed to meet the challenges posed by the Legal Services Act 2007 and give barristers a more cost-effective and time-efficient way to practise.

Rather than working in a traditional chambers, BarFutures provided management and marketing services and working accommodation in London and Manchester, to enable barristers to operate remotely and remain fully independent while benefiting from shared support.

It gave solicitors a more cost-effective and streamlined way to instruct barristers, using BarFutures’ own barristers, or the organisation’s nationwide network of affiliated chambers.

If you’re a sceptic of the quality solicitors concept, then you’ll likely not be a fan of this either. In so many ways, I’m not surprised that this has failed to take off, given the deep-seated conservatism of the profession. But this wasn’t really that radical compared to some of the proposals that have been floating about over the last few years, some of which involved barristers essentially becoming home workers who congregated in ‘virtual’ chambers.

barristers-a-go-go2But part of me thinks that the name, ‘BarFutures’ might have been the stumbling block, here. Something a bit more free and easy might have been the answer. How about Barristers-a-Go-Go ?

Comments

  1. That sounds very much like the Scottish bar model. It's extremely profitable up north.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Clerksroom.com (another virtual chambers) has been around for years, and they're doing quite well...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Law Actually is 10 years old today

Blogger’s new templates: Contempo, Soho, Emporio and Notable

We noticed you’re using an ad-blocker. Oh really?