Ladder fiasco ends in tragedy

telegraph pole engineerFrom the Independent 15/12/10:

BT was fined £300,000 today after a judge said a "significant failing" by the company contributed to the death of one its engineers.

David Askew, 52, died after falling from a stepladder while working at the Canonbury Telephone Exchange, north London, in October 2006.

The experienced engineer was standing on the top rung of the seven-foot ladder and working alone at the time of his death, Southwark Crown Court, central London, heard.

The accident resulted in BT being convicted of failing to ensure the health and safety of its employees at a trial in October this year.

Judge Deborah Taylor said the company had not provided appropriate ladders, leading Mr Askew to use a wooden ladder he found on the site.

Staff working at heights had also been given "erroneous advice" in BT's manuals, which did not consider the most up-to-date legislation, she continued.

She said: "This was a significant failing by BT, whose employees regularly work at height."

"In my judgment these failures by BT contributed to Mr Askew's fall," she concluded.

That’s staggering; I thought wooden ladders went out in the 70s.

But I still don’t understand why didn’t the poor chap have ladders provided to him? What are those long silver things stuck on the roofs of the white Openreach vans?  Presumably they’re not just there for show.

And how’s this for an interesting perspective:

Ronald Thwaites QC, mitigating, said that the odds of being killed by lighting were 10 million to one, while BT employees carried out nine million climbing jobs a year.

He said: "If, on a statistical basis, deaths from falls were only as likely as death by lightning bolt strikes, most people would recognise that is a fairly remarkable record."

Well, possibly. But it’s tough to reconcile that with the fact the poor guy had to find his own (wooden) ladder. What’s more, I don’t think that’s really comparing like with like. Out of those people who are struck by lightning, surely it’s more likely they are killed rather than just suffering injuries when compared to those who are killed falling from a ladder - where the number of injuries (as opposed to deaths) must be much higher. So maybe that statistic isn’t so compelling.

Put another way, it would be very interesting to see how many people are injured or harmed without being killed by lightning strikes compared to suffering a personal injury falling from a ladder.

In any event, if that’s their stance, maybe 9 million climbing jobs a year using the right equipment and procedures would give BT a sublime safety record?  It might be something to aim for at least.

Comments

  1. And of course, you're much more likely to be struck by lightning while climbing up a ladder. I assume that's why she thought the statistic was relevant.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yeah, I thought that initially, but I read up on the story from a few other sources and there was no mention of him being struck by lightning or lightning being otherwise involved.

    The poor chap seems to have simply slipped and fallen from about 4 metres and sustained serious head injuries.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The office of national statistics webstie is quite opaque on the matter; so I went to google where I found that,

    "20% of all lightning victims die from the strike."

    From strike alert

    So, 80% of all lightning victims don't die from the strike.

    Dividing the brief's 10 million to one figure by 4 gives,

    the chance of being hit by lightning and not being killed is 2.5 million to one.

    But get someone else to check the mathematical reasoning before taking it as read.

    I wonder how many BT engineers get struck by lightning? 3 to 4 per annum?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Good research! :-)

    So how does that figure compare with injuries & deaths resulting from falls from ladders at about 4 metres? ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  5. The reason he didn't get struck by lightning was because he was climbing a wooden ladder.

    The use of metal ladders probably increases the risk of lightning strikes. How does that squew the statistics?

    ReplyDelete
  6. But that wouldn't stop him being *struck*, surely? It just means 10 'squizillion' volts wouldn't flow through him like a length of copper wire. ;-)

    And don't electricians and telecoms guys have composite ladders nowadays so they don't fry themselves in overhead lines when manoeuvring their ladders into place?
    ... I think it's only your average painter and decorator who carries a metal ladder now.

    Not that I'm a ladder expert or anything... :p

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts